flying back

27030001.JPG
(war, by the way, in between) 

27030005.JPG

the morning light is beautiful. while yesterday the Washington bridge was disappearing in the fog and pouring rain, this morning the sky and the sun were just so bright. it is very early when we leave the house. a man at the subway entrance distributes newspapers, announcing good deals and sales. i forgot, this is black friday, christmas shopping should begin. i enjoy the busride to La Guardia, Queens, the ride through Harlem, the beautiful views on the city once we cross the water. and some time later, breathtaking views on the city from the sky.

i booked this ticket quite late; what made it affordable was travelling on the friday after Thanksgiving, a time when obviously many people are taking a long weekend. but i discover that there was more that kept the price down – two overlays: New York – Chicago – San Diego – San Jose. in the clear sky and with window seats all along the way, i was all happy again to cross this country and watch it with a bird’s eye. the new part was flying all the way down to San Diego – a different landscape, i caught a glimpse of Mexico. the last stretch, from San Diego to San Jose, is amazing. the whole of Southren California, the ocean, the entire coastline. i saw Big Sur. the very last part of the journey moves me: i recognize Monterey Bay with its small towns of Monterey, Salinas, Watsonville, Santa Cruz. by the time we fly over the Santa Cruz mountains, the sun has set behind us and we fly into a maze of lights – the south end of Silicon Valley and the city of San Jose. i already felt it went it left for this trip – this piece of earth is starting to feel familiar.

27030014.JPG

27030015.JPG

south west

since the flight to Poland earlier this year, i’ve made a habit of the study of the company magazine on board. the advertisements and articles draw the contours of a region which SouthWest seems to target, and identify with – California, Nevada (and lots of Las Vegas ads…), Arizona, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Florida. this month’s issue includes a special feature on New Orleans, more than 30 pages, all geared towards getting tourists back as part of the reconstruction – the part of reconstruction that the authorities focus on: making the French Quarter ready for tourism. from an interview with hotel manager in the French Quarter, in the article ReNew Orleans: “It is OK to come to New Orleans. That’s the message I’d want to leave you with, that I’d want everyone to get. The city that you’ve always loved is still here. So if you don’t know how to help, coming here is really helpful. Come to New Orleans and have a great time. It’s OK. We want you here.”

cramped in my row with two fellow passengers from California flying east. a young guy who works at Google. with his yellow Google t-shirt and his enthousiasm, he’s a natural ambassador for the company. “What is it that attracts you,” asks our fellow traveller, who shares my google criticism (mind you, i use it all the time…) but is genuinely interested in the attraction of things. “I’ve never been in an environment with such a bunch of intelligent and creative people. I feel I’m being stimulated to think, to be creative, all of the time.” i think i get it, yes, this is how Silicon Valley works, this is the creative and dynamic side of capitalism that the Communist Manifesto invokes so magnificantly. the other travel companion turns out to be professor in Monterey. she’s a theologian, working on the intersection of women, religion and violence. (i had already spotted her taking notes for a lecture on globalization, WTO and popular protests.) we talk and talk. she did fieldwork in asia and focused on buddhism, looking into liberation movements that at some point or another use violent means. the contradictions of what she calls “militant pacifism”…

intimate politics

i’m working hard to meet the deadlines before leaving. eh maría, i’ve been working in your room today – it is beautiful to know your room like this, and it reminds me of you. mihui sneeked in with a book, asking if it was okay if she’d read while i wrote (this is becoming the collective working room). she made me laugh: she seemed hesitant at first, and when i made it clear that of course she’s welcome to do so, and of course i don’t mind that she’s in pyjamas, she did a mihui cheer: “all right, this is like family!”

but despite all the work clea convinced me to come to the Santa Cruz Bookstore tonight to hear Bettina Aptheker present her memoires – Intimate Politics. and i’m happy that i went. there is something fascinating and challenging to the way my brain tends to order things and history about having this small woman in front of you talking about growing up (with parents who were part of the communist party and targetted by the communist witch hunt; with W.E.B. DuBois as an affectionate grandpa-style friend coming to the house; with Angela Davis as a friend since they were eight) and going to college (Berkeley in the sixties, becoming a leader in the student movements). something about how quotidian (and familiar – oh how student movements can resemble each other…) it all sounds, only to be constantly interrupted by the sense of “big history”. how she campaigned to get Angela Davis out of jail in the early 1970s. her split with the communist party in the early 1980s, after years of struggling to reconcile feminism and marxism (they wouldn’t publish the book on women and race they commissioned from her, it was deemed too feminist).

what stuck most with clea was the friendship between these two woman – angela and bettina – since they were 8 years old, studying at the same university then (berkeley), teaching at the same university now (santa cruz), and all of their radical political trajectory in between. it made me think that these kind of memoires should be written in a collective way.

uncanny locations

left on a kitchen table: a magazine which introduces Santa Cruz to the new students. as a glance through it i find out that Hitchcock lived just around the corner, in Scott’s Valey, for a good number of years. that the infamous house in Psycho stood not far from here. that the story for Birds was based on a real story that took place in a Californian village a bit up north. how the uncanny character of this place can be very inspiring…

zorro

c’est dans mon lit dans la paix de ma chambre au coenraetsstraat que je termine Isabelle Allende’s Zorro – ou elle re-invente la légende de Zorro d’une façon magnifique. L’histoire commence en Alta California et ses missions espagnoles.

“Let us begin at the beginning, at an event without which Diego de la Vega would not have been born. It happened in Alta California, in the San Gabriel mission in the year 1790 of Our Lord. At that time the mission was under the charge of Padre Mendoza, a Fanciscan who had the shoulders of a woodcutter and a much younger appearance than his forty well-lived years warranted. […] The natives of the coast of California had a network of trade and commerce that had functioned for thousands of years. Their surroundings were very rich in natural resources, and the tribes developed different specialties. The Spanish were impressed iwth the Chumash economy, so complex that it could be compared to that of China. The Indians had a monetary system based on shells, and they regularly organizes fairs that served as an opportunity to exchange goods as well as contract marriages.

Those native peoples were confounded by the mystery of the crucified man the whites workshipped, and they could not understand the advantage of living contrary to their inclinations in this world in order to enjoy a hypothetical well-being in another. In the paradise of the Christians, they might take their ease on a could and strum a harp with the angels, but the truth was that in the afterworld most would rather hunts bears with their ancestors in the land of the Great Spirit. Another thing they could not understand was why the foreigners planted a flag in the ground, marked off imaginary lines, claimed that area as theirs, and then took offense if anyone came onto it in pursuit of a deer. The concept that you could posses land was unfanthomable to them as that of dividing up the sea.

In their letters to the director of missions in Mexico, the friars complained, “The Indians prefer to live unclothed, in straw huts, armed with bow and arrow, with no education, goverment, religion or respect for authority, and dedicated entirely to satisfying their shameless appetites, as if the miraculous waters of baptism had never washed away their sins.” The Indians’ insistence on clingign to the their customs had to be the work of Satan – their was no other explanation – which is why the friars went out to hunt down and lasso the deserters and then whipped their doctrine of love and forgiveness into them.”

But then Padre Mendoza receives news that several tribes led by a warrior wearing a wolf’s head had risen up against the whites…

yosemite

Yosemite. Yet another place on this continent that gets “discovered” and subsequently misnamed, by the first expedition of the Mariposa Battalion. Their mission was a punitive one. After gold was discovered in the Sierra Nevada foothills in 1848, thousands of miners came to the region to seek for their fortune. As the goldseekers began to exploit the land, the local native people fought to protect their homelands. A period of armed struggle followed, called the “Mariposa Indian War”. The Yosemite guide actually begins to give a just account: “By 1851, the continued threft of Indian lands and murder of native people resulted in the Mariposa Indian War.” As the Indians were angered by the encroachment of the western settlers and the way it destroyed their world, they attacked a trading post in the Merced River Canyon. In retaliation, the miners organized the state-sanctioned Mariposa Battalion.

This is the Battalion that, in the pursuit of Indians, entered Yosemite Valley on March 27, 1851. They were immediately struck by the beauty of the place. (from a diary of one of the members of the battalion: The grandeur of the scene was but softened by the haze that hung over the valley — light as gossamer — and by the clouds which partially dimmed the higher cliffs and mountains. This obscurity of vision but increased the awe with which I beheld it, and as I looked, a peculiar exalted sensation seemed to fill my whole being, and I found my eyes in tears with emotion.) That night the group agreed to call the place “Yo-sem-i-ty”, which they mistakeningly thought to be the native name.

The Indians who lived in the valley called their home Ahwahnee, which probably means “place of the gaping mouth.” They called themselves Ahwahneechee. They were primarily of Southern Miwok ancestry, and had trade and kinship ties with the Mono Paiutes from the east side of the Sierra (near Mono lake). Indian peoples have lived in the region for as long as 8,000 years, maybe even 10,000 years. They have profoundly marked the way the valley looks today: the pattern of oaks and grasslands is a result of the way they intentionally burned pieces of the land. They knew very well that the seeds of the giant sequoias need the heat of fire to grow, a knowledge that was only “discovered” in the 1960s by the National Park authorities, as the Visitors Center explains. So while the geological landscape is the result of many millions years of activity of water and especially ice (glaciers appeared about 1 million years ago), the valley is very much a space that has been cultivated by humans for a good number of thousands years.

Yet in 1851 white settlers of European origin arrive and they see wilderness. I’m deeply disturbed by this lens of “wilderness” in looking at a place – the projections and symbolic violence of that kind of representation, the actual violence it enables. In the years following the coming of the white settlers, the Indians were both killed and chased from the valley (into reservations at the foothills). Settlers moved in and by 1855 a first party of tourists came to the “Incomparable Valley”. Very soon Yosemite Valley’s ecosystem suffered from the new settlers and visitors: livestock grazing in the meadows, new orchard plantations, etc. Conservationists began appealing to the government to intervene again the private exploitation of Yosemite’s natural beauty. On June 30, 1864 (while the civil war was raging), President Abraham Lincoln signed a bill granting Yosemite Valley and the Mariposa Grove of Giant Sequoias to the State of California “for public use, resort and recreation,” the two tracts “shall be inalienable for all time”. For the first time in its young history, the federal government set aside scenic lands to protect them and to allow for their enjoyment by all people. This grant is considered the foundation upon which national and state parks were established (it was the basis for Yellowstone to become the first official national park in 1872).

The conservationist most connected to Yosemite is no doubt the Scottish-born John Muir, who first visited the valley in 1868. Here’s a piece of his narration of his first journey from San Francisco into the Sierra Nevada: Arriving by the Panama steamer, I stopped one day in San Francisco and then inquired for the nearest way out of town. “But where do you want to go?” asked the man to whom I had applied for this important information. “To any place that is wild,” I said. This reply startled him. He seemed to fear I might be crazy and therefore the sooner I was out of town the better, so he directed me to the Oakland ferry. So on the first of April, 1868, I set out afoot for Yosemite. […] Looking eastward from the summit of the Pacheco Pass one shining morning, a landscape was displayed that after all my wanderings still appears as the most beautiful I have ever beheld. At my feet lay the Great Central Valley of California, level and flowery, like a lake of pure sunshine, forty or fifty miles wide, five hundred miles long, one rich furred garden of yellow CompositÅ“. And from the eastern boundary of this vast golden flower-bed rose the mighty Sierra, miles in height, and so gloriously colored and so radiant, it seemed not clothed with light, but wholly composed of it, like the wall of some celestial city. Along the top and extending a good way down, was a rich pearl-gray belt of snow; below it a belt of blue and lark purple, marking the extension of the forests; and stretching long the base of the range a broad belt of rose-purple; all these colors, from the blue sky to the yellow valley smoothly blending as they do in a rainbow, making a wall of light ineffably fine. Then it seemed to me that the Sierra should be called, not the Nevada or Snowy Range, but the Range of Light. And after ten years of wandering and wondering in the heart of it, rejoicing in its glorious floods of light, the white beams of the morning streaming through the passes, the noonday radiance on the crystal rocks, the flush of the alpenglow, and the irised spray of countless waterfalls, it still seems above all others the Range of Light.

If Muir is enchanted by the Californian Sierra, repeating a number of times that “no mark of man is visibile upon it”, he is struck with awe by the valley, which he compares to a temple. The most famous and accessible of these cañon valleys, and also the one that presents their most striking and sublime features on the grandest scale, is the Yosemite, situated in the basin of the Merced River at an elevation of 4000 feet above the level of the sea. It is about seven miles long, half a mile to a mile wide, and nearly a mile deep in the solid granite flank of the range. The walls are made up of rocks, mountains in size, partly separated from each other by side cañons, and they are so sheer in front, and so compactly and harmoniously arranged on a level floor, that the Valley, comprehensively seen, looks like an immense hall or temple lighted from above. But no temple made with hands can compare with Yosemite. Every rock in its walls seems to glow with life. Some lean back in majestic repose; others, absolutely sheer or nearly so for thousands of feet, advance beyond their companions in thoughtful attitudes, giving welcome to storms and calms alike, seemingly aware, yet heedless, of everything going on about them. Awful in stern, immovable majesty, how softly these rocks are adorned, and how fine and reassuring the company they keep: their feet among beautiful groves and meadows, their brows in the sky, a thousand flowers leaning confidingly against their feet, bathed in floods of water, floods of light, while the snow and waterfalls, the winds and avalanches and clouds shine and sing and wreathe about them as the years go by, and myriads of small winged creatures birds, bees, butterflies–give glad animation and help to make all the air into music. Down through the middle of the Valley flows the crystal Merced, River of Mercy, peacefully quiet, reflecting lilies and trees and the onlooking rocks; things frail and fleeting and types of endurance meeting here and blending in countless forms, as if into this one mountain mansion Nature had gathered her choicest treasures, to draw her lovers into close and confiding communion with her.

The only human activity that Muir recognizes in this garden of Eden, is the destruction by the new settlers. Perhaps more than half of all the big trees have been thoughtlessly sold and are now in the hands of speculators and mill men. […] All private claims within these bounds should be gradually extinguished by purchase by the Government. It was clear to Muir that the Yosemite would not survive the new economy and its commercial drive: These temple destroyers, devotees of ravaging commercialism, seem to have a perfect contempt for Nature, and, instead of lifting their eyes to the God of the mountains, lift them to the Almighty Dollar.

Muir’s campaign for the preservation of the region resulted in the creation of the Yosemite National Park in 1890, with the inclusion of Yosemite Valley and the Maripose grove in 1906, when they were ceded from Californian state control to the federal state. The mission of the National Parks was articulated as such: to administer all parks “in such manner and by such means as to leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.”

Then comes a piece of the story that i had no idea at all about. The park was under federal protection, but there was no National Park Service until until 1916. Which meant the park was protected for at least 10 years by the U.S. Army’s 24th Mounted Infantry and the 9th Cavalry, also known as the “Buffalo Soldiers” (remember Bob Marley’s song?), which were Afro-American regiments. They were established by Congress as the first peacetime all-black regiments in the U.S. Army. So just after the civil war, just after the general abolishment of slavery in the new republic. It seems that the Buffalo Soldiers were send to fight the Indian wars and then the Mexican wars. I need to find out more about this. Meanwhile i have this image in my mind of the immense natural beauty of Yosemite, white settlers (for money and gold), white conservationists (for “wilderness” sake), the massacre of Indians and their livelihoods, and recently broken-free-from-slavery Afro-American soldiers enacting federal laws in the region.

Yosemite – a monument of natural heritage, closely tied up with the establishment of national parks as an institution. Full of ambiguities, as the history of Yosemite shows. But not able to escape this ground of ambiguity&violence on this continent – there is indeed no garden of eden to be found here – it’s one of the few institutions of this new world i encountered thus far that i actually feel much sympathy for.

There’s something about the regulation of the masses that felt refreshing: access is not totally open, and it doesn’t work along criteria of money. You can only stay 7 nights in the valley during the summer period, 30 nights during the rest of the year. You have to camp in the designated camping areas. If you want to camp outside of the designated camping areas, you need to apply for a “wilderness pass”. And there’s something about keeping commercialization controlled. The groceries shops, the shop with hiking gear and the food places are all in the same wooden lodge style. Organized along “ethnic” niches of food – italian, mexican,… – but not branded. On our way back home the high way through every small insignificant town was basically a line up of the familiar colours and logos of McDonalds, Pizza Hut, KFC, Taco Bell,… and just imagine how much these companies would pay for a license to open a franchise in the park (with it’s 3,5 million visitors a year…). But they are not there, and what a break that is. And then there’s something about civic education: in the context of the U.S. it feel so good to come to a place where the value of the public sphere is somehow communicated. In fact, this site of natural heritage is the most “public” space (i.e. infused with an ethos of public good, not to be confused with the mall…) i’ve encountered since i live in this California. There’s even something about passion: in the short conversations i had with people working in the park, like Bill and the elderly lady in the Visitors Center, it struck me how much they were invested and believed in the value of their work, for the public good, for future generations.

And of course the ambiguity doesn’t go away, and of course much could be improved. Like a move away from the emphasis on “wilderness” and “natural” park to fully include the human history of the place, and some kind of memorial & educational project on the genocide in the region. And get those cars out of the valley! (which would be such an opportunity for an educational experience on how public transport – the free hybrid busses that connect the whole valley – can function perfectly well).

oh, and then i must make a confession. nothing to do about it: in places of mass tourism which Yosemite definately is – visitation exceeded one million in 1954, and in the mid-1990s there were more than four million visitors a year – i just get into a communist-pioneer state of mind: education and leisure for the masses who are collectively responsible for the place, and should interpellate each other on the vices of individual indulgence… ay ay ay…

lucky

IMGP3795.JPG

Arriving in Yosemite. When we finally got to our tents in Camp 4 i was happy to be sleeping so close to the earth and being able to look at the stars in the sky. The tiredness of having finished the article in the morning hours before leaving. Being together in a group without having found a way of speaking truthfully to each other, even about the things each of us desired to do, let alone about how to puzzle these together. A deep sleep which brought purpose and luck, so that in the morning i knew that i had to call the stables in the valley and see if there would still be a possibility to join one of the horse trail rides. By noon i was on a horse called Lucky.

It’s been forever since i’ve been riding. The ride was open for “beginners” with less than 10 hours of riding – a criterium which put me in the category of “advanced”, where i don’t feel i belong. Nothing spectacular in terms of technicalities, nor any galloping in open space. (Still, we first had to watch a small video showing all the possible accidents that could happen, and then sign a paper in which we declared that we understood that we could die. After all, this is America in the grip of an economy of insurance… ) Pretty much a path along which one horse followed the other.

This was my first horse trail of such a kind, with a “western” style (in contrast to “English” style) sadle and riding techniques. It was enchanting. Immersed in the immense beauty of Yosemite. The horse trail took us along the Tenaya creek to the Mirror Lake and its meadows and back; a trail that brought us passed the Half Dome on the side where the granite was dramatically split in half, thousands of years ago. The water of the creek and the lake came straight from the melting snow up in the Sierra. The horse trail had only been open for 2 weeks now, while usually they would have been open for almost a month this time of year. The stables higher up in the mountains were still closed, while usually they would be open by now. As we were riding, one of the guides, Bill, explained that in all the time he’d been working in the stables in Yosemite – three months every spring and summer since 1975 (i realised later on that he must have been there when we visited Yosemite with my family in 1979) – he hadn’t see a year with so much rain and snow like this one. When i went to the Visitor’s Center later on, an eldery grey-haired woman, who radiated sheer passion for the national park in which she worked, declared the year to be “disasterous”. The amount of roads and passes that were still closed, without even a perspective on when they would open. She shook her head in dispair. It’s true that water poured into the valley from all sides with such abondance and such violence – whether this spring is exceptional or not, it is very impressive. Bill saw connections: the exceptional snow and water was paired up with the slowly drying up of Mirror Lake and the surrounding creeks. Soon enough the snow at the source of the creeks would be gone; since the valley’s underground is granite, it holds no water at all. And to Bill it seemed that, as the summers go by, the time span in which the creeks are dry gets longer and longer. In the Visitors Center i learned that this “vein”, or canyon of the valley was somehow the youngest, therefore providing an image of how the others were some thousand years before, and by mirror image the rest of the valley reflecting what the Tenaya Canyon would become.

But there was more to the ride than the beauty of the nature surrounding us. There was the effort of riding a mountainous terrain on a horse – a new thing for me. The way the horses slipped constantly: the sound of horseshoes hitting and sliding on rock, and the way their bodies jerked as if the slide came unexpectedly. Probably they were just moving to keep themselves in balance. Learning how to move my body and weight in order to climb or descend with Lucky, and not just be a heavy backpack he has to carry along.

And there was still more to the horse trail. As i was settling into Lucky’s rhythm and taking in the beauty of the nature around me, my thoughts started to take me to the crossing of the mountains by those pioneers of the 19th century who pushed America’s frontiers westwards. This wasn’t the first time i was thinking about those journeys, only some weeks ago when i flew back from Washington i had been absorbed by such thoughts. The Denver-San Jose flight took us over the Rocky Mountains in sky that remained cloudless till the very westside of the Sierra Nevada, that is until the plane hit the west coast clouds. For hours i looked down in fascination to the range of mountains that those pioneers had crossed. My eyes kept on frantically discerning possible routes from many kilometers above, only to find time and time again that the imaginary trail i saw would come to some kind of dramatic dead-end. I kept on imagining the horses and wagons needing to turn around, to search for another trail. Stories of this west-ward travel had accompanied me during my flight from London to San Francisco in the beginning of this year, as I was reading Joan Didion’s Where I was From. The Sierra Nevada as the most dreaded moment in the pioneer narratives Didion talked about; Independence Rock which was named as such because those who didn’t reach the rock by the first of July had no chance of reaching the passes before snow closed them. There’s something about reading or thinking about such narratives when flying to California, and then there is something else about thinking about them while doing a horse-trail in the Californian mountains.

IMGP3805.JPG IMGP3824.JPG IMGP3826.JPG

You could say that Lucky and i were a good match. When we were still at the stables waiting to start the trail, i knew that Lucky wanted to drink some more water – he had made that abundantly clear – which i figured he should be able to do. The result was that we came in at the very end of the trail, as Bill was waiting to close it. It was Bill’s job to make sure that nobody fell out of the trail or was left behind. But soon enough a horse with a temperament started kicking the horse behind him, which scared at least two horses who began messing up the trail. Bill needed to leave his closing position to calm the horses down, and to help the riders to keep a better distance. “Will you be fine?” he asked before he left. Sure. The only thing was: Lucky prefered to go kind of slow, and i wasn’t in a hurry either, so as we were strolling along we gradually lagged behind the trail. I was just immensely enjoying our solitude when Bill got back us. “I don’t know if it’s Lucky or if it’s me, but we’re kind of slow,” i said. By way of explanation, not apology, cause i didn’t really feel like changing our rhythm. “Ah, don’t worry”, said Bill, “Lucky is not slow. He’s safe. Doesn’t that sound better?” We laughed, and i liked it a lot. I remember thinking: i need to tell this to Chaim tonight – we’re not slow, we’re safe. And with even more trust in Lucky i let his reins totally free when the terrain was a bit difficult. When we needed to descend he sometimes just stopped for a little while, and i limited my role in these moments to saying: “Lucky, you just go down when you want to”, which he eventually would do. When the terrain was easier and flatter i had to exhort him a bit because clearly we lagged behind quite a stretch. But Bill, on his impressive mule (they are more confident on mountainous terrain) never told me to hurry up. He would also linger behind, sometimes next to us or just in front, and we both looked a bit doubtful to the riders ahead who were pushing and pulling on their horses. I really got lucky that day.

fredissimo

Some things must be said. People, here and back home, obviously resist this piece of information, but the winter is really cold here in Santa Cruz. Selma’s present, a warm and soft set of legwarmers, was providential, to say the least. When i was still living with María, we would complain about how cold the house and lousy the heating system was. Which we mostly only turned on when the temperature inside started falling below 56 degrees. Somehow this sounded a lot. Until i got myself to check, two weeks ago, how that would convert in celsius: around 13 degrees. When i moved to my new house and we first drove to the Capitola Mall to get a comforter and pillows, i got so lucky that María convinced me to get the “extra warm” comforter. Remember they are genetically modified here. As i was dragging the big thing behind me a shop attendent commented: “So you guys are cold sleepers, huh.” After my first night in my new house i understood that the new comforter was fine, but probably one of the lightest i ever had.

Cause this is the thing: it wouldn’t have to be so cold if everybody lived up to the fact that this part of California is simply cold in winter, and organized their houses and lives accordingly. Of course it’s not really cold, not like in Kazan for instance where during the winter the temperature regularly drops to minus 30. But in Kazan there’s a whole culture around protecting the body from the cold, and the house where i lived, situated in a run-down and shabby neighborhood of the city, was always intensly warm. Too warm sometimes, and then the only remedy was opening a window, since central heating meant that the heating system was regulated centrally for the whole neighborhood. (ah, rampant individualism here makes me nostalgic for these collective arrangements…) But here we are up against a persistent myth of warm & sunny California. So people go around in t-shirts and sandals, houses have lousy heating, and “extra warm” comforters need some fleece blankets on top to do the job during these wintery days. The best kept secret, Diana called it the other day. She had never been so cold than after moving from London to San Francisco, where she had to put on a jumper and socks in bed at night in order not to freeze. It was June. The secret is well kept, and so there are all these hard hermetically sealed bodies performing the myth of warm and sunny California. Meanwhile i’m freezing.

***

snow2.jpg An amazing winter wonderland storm hit the Bay area yesterday. Unseen, unheard of. It started with giant hail hitting the earth in the afternoon, and it continued all evening long with hail becoming snow as you move away from the ocean (or is it snow becoming hail in the ocean’s vicinity) and roaring thunder and lightening. Highway 17 closed down. The streets covered in white hail-snow. People making pictures, fighting with hail-snow balls. Today people asking each other “where were you yesterday night?” and telling their stories of winter adventures. snow2.jpg
 
snow2.jpg And so we… we had a wonderful heart-warming dinner with Clea and David. By the time we had dessert we sat in the candle light to better witness all the rage outside. Then, in the excitement of the storm, David proposed to drive to the ocean. Amazing. This never happens in Santa Cruz, they kept on saying. It’s since the two ladies from Belgium came, Clea insisted. snow2.jpg

a matter of degree

More of Baudrillard on America. Dans son style délirant, en effet il y a vraiment trop de délire dans son livre, but i guess the name of my blog oblige

“Like many other aspects of contemporary America, Santa Cruz is part of the post-orgy world, the world left behind after the great social and sexual convulsions. The refugees from the orgy – the orgy of sex, political violence, the Vietnam war, the Woodstock Crusade, and the ethnic and anti-capitalist struggles too, together with the passion for money, the passion for success, hard technologies etc., in short the whole orgy of modernity – are all there, jogging along in their tribalism, which is akin to the electronic tribalism of Silicon Valley. Reduced pace of work, decentralization, air-conditioning, soft technologies. Paradise. But a very slight modification, a change of just a few degrees, would suffice to make it seem like hell.”

the mission

Santa Cruz was established in 1791, by padre Fermin Francisco de Lasuén, as the 12th Spanish Catholic mission in Alta California; it was “baptised” on the 25th of September of that year as “Misión la exaltación de la Santa Cruz”. As the Spanish government feared that other empires (the British) were after the territory, a mission in the very north end of the Monterey Bay was of strategic importance for Spanish rule over the Californian coast. The mission offered an outlook over the whole bay; moreover, it was near the ocean which could be used for trade, next to the San Lorenzo River (named as such by the Spanish explorer Don Gaspar de Portola who “discovered” it in 1769) that could be used to irrigate the lands, and surrounded by the redwood forests that could be logged and used for wood.

mission1.JPG

Then the information leaflet from the Santa Cruz Mission State Historic Park starts getting uncomfortable… Another reason listed under the heading “Why put a Mission here?” are the Native Americans who could start working at the mission. The phrasing remains a bit vague, and we’re left wondering exactely what they mean to suggest: that the Spanish were looking for (cheap) labor, that the Native Americans were unemployed and seeking for a major regional employer, that it was a perfect match?

The Native Americans. Central California had the densest Indian population anywhere north of Mexico before the Spanish arrived. Over 10,000 people lived in the coastal area between Point Sur and the San Francisco Bay. The Spanish called them Costaños, which became Costanoan in American-English. Since the 1960s all the native Americans who used to live around San Francisco Bay and Monterey Bay are referred to by the name “Ohlone” – which might have come from a Spanish rancho called Oljon, or from the name of an Indian site near modern-day San Mateo. The Ohlone people who used to live in the Santa Cruz region – i did not even find traces of how this land used to be called before – were called Awaswas, and this included the Sokel (who lived at Aptos) and the Chatu-mu (who lived near the current location of Santa Cruz).

None of the Ohlone people who lived in this area survived. The mission started in 1791 and ran till 1834 (when the Mexican government secularized it) and none of the Ohlone survived.

mission2.JPG

The Santa Cruz Mission State Historic Park is a very uncomfortable place. It is housed in the only original building of the Mission that remains – which makes it the oldest building in Santa Cruz. A white adobe rectangular building with 7 rooms one behind the other, part of what used to be a larger building with 17 rooms. It was build to house those Native Americans who were considered the most trustworthy and given certain privileges, neophytes they were called. Each of these rooms housed a neophyte family. There is something ironic and immensly sad about the fact that the neophyte dwellings are the only ones that remain from the whole mission enterprise.

Santa Cruz Mission was called the “hard luck” mission; it was also the first one to be closed down by the Mexican government. I suppose one could call the genocide of the Ohlone people “hard luck”, only the genocide doesn’t figure in the leaflet of the Santa Cruz Mission State Historic Park. The leaflet does tells us that “many of the workers died of the new diseases”, “a group of native people attacked the Mission and burned buildings”, “natives who didn’t like the mission ran away”, “one of their priests was murdered” (only one, i can’t help asking myself, the Ohlone people were more generous with life than can be said of their colonizers…). Yes, all of this must have made it difficult to run the mission, i suppose. Not easy, to run a mission in those conditions.

mission4.gif

And the mission was big. By 1814, an old report reveals, they had 3,300 cattle, 3,500 sheep, 600 horses, 25 mules, and 46 hogs. And imagine the crops needed to feed all those hungry mouths. A handful of padres clearly cannot manage this on their own. When the mission was founded word was spread that there was work in exchange for food, shelter and education; and many Ohlone people came to the mission to work. What they didn’t know: there was no way back. Once you worked at the mission you could not leave, and the mission could count on the Spanish army to make that rule effective.

If the language of the Historic Park’s leaflet and on the educational signs on the site is upsetting, it is a conversation in the Park’s shop during my visist last weekend that made me really angry. When i entered the shop a (white) lady of the Santa Cruz Mission State Park was talking to a girl who must have been 10 years old – one of these beautiful bright ones with inquisitive eyes and a reserved smile full of resolution. The State Park lady was infantilizing the girl with her story of the Mission, but the girl took ignorance with polite reservation. As the lady’s story of the mission unfolded the girls’ parents stopped checking out the merchandise, threw each other glances, and got closer to their daughter. The lady in turn happily continued infantilizing the whole family.

As soon as the Spanish priests came here, she explained, they wanted to get the local people involved. The language of Empire, and how it can make you grasp for air. Involved. Just imagine for a moment. One of the padres writing home: Hermano querido. Llegamos bien en Santa Cruz, y somos listos comenzar nuestra misión. Escucho, tengo una idea. ¿Qué piensa de implicar a la población local? ¿Podía ser interessante, no? Many months later a ship brings a letter responding: ¡Eso es una idea genial! Vaya, hermano. ¡Con nuestras bendiciones! And Lo and Behold, a succesful recipe of Empire was born: get the local people involved.

The conversation was marked by the language of empire in different layers. The lady was talking about the Spanish missions of more than 200 hundred years ago, but her discourse was of course situated in the contemporary U.S. Empire. The imaginary exchange between the padres is indeed quite unlikely, for sure their discussions and exchanges were not so tainted by efforts to draw upon a democratic-participatory rhetoric. “Involving the local population” is no doubt a very late capitalism way of talking, now that Empire has “involved” the people of Afghanistan in their own liberation, is “involving” Iraq in their own democracy, and has many more projects of getting people all around the world more “involved”.

mission3.jpg

In the lady’s story many indians liked to be involved, and some got involved so well that they made trustworthy and good Christians and as a reward got to move into the adobe housing and live with their families. So the others couldn’t live with their families? the mother asked. The lady explained that men were separated from women and children, to prevent them running away, you see. Running away? the mother inquired. So the lady explained that for some of the Ohlone the Mission wasn’t really… well, it wasn’t what they had expected. But once they worked at the Mission they couldn’t leave anymore, you see, those were the rules.

(Thank god for the neophytes! They saved the mission! Give thanks! How unfortunate that the mission didn’t save them.)

Yet another dimension to the conversation added to the anger: the lady remained totally blind for the way the (latino) family was increasingly uncomfortable with her hollywood version of history. There was no listening. The mother kept on asking questions seeking some kind of recognition – “so they couldn’t live with their families?”, “so they all died?”, … She wasn’t searching for a political recognition, it seemed, but a mere recognition of shared humanity and thus shared indignation. What does it mean to do this to other people. But none of that affected our happy guardian of State History.

Although at the end she did sigh. Yes, it had all been very sad, very sad indeed, for the padres, for the Spanish, for the natives. It had been difficult times for everybody…

***

Anger that pushed me to find out a bit more about this history. Not easy to find alternative versions, but on Wikipedia i read that, as far available sources indicate, Santa Cruz mission as the first California mission to come under armed attack by the local population. A history of revolt to be reclaimed:

“On the night of December 14, 1793, Mission Santa Cruz was attacked and partially burned by members of the local Quiroste tribe who inhabited the mountains to the east of Point Año Nuevo. The attack was purportedly motivated by the forced relocation of native Indians to the Mission. In 1812, Father Andres Quintana was assassinated and had his testicles smashed by natives angry over his use of a metal-tipped whip in the punishment of Mission laborers.”

And i found a group that is working towards recognition of the Ohlone people, as there are people of Ohlone origin in other regions of California, see www.muwekma.org

Makkin Mak Haûûesin Hemme Ta Makiû Horûe Mak-Muwekma, Rooket Mak Yiûûasin Huyyunciû Éinniinikma!

We Will Make Things Right For Our People And Dance For Our Children!