another bag search at the airport security. i only have carry on luggage, so i went through some trouble of figuring out the liquids, risking my magic trick of juggling two transparent bags each with the approved amount of liquid stuff. and it works again! neither is it the old patch on my sweat shirt, empire will be destroyed, which maggie gave a doubtful look when she dropped me off at the airport. it’s… a potato. the single potato wrapped in cellophane that i got at the New Market supermarket, well hidden in my bag, provoked their suspicion. for once i couldn’t agree more with the homeland security people, this potato is a most dangerous and explosive object.
Category: security
academic tourism
(a Boston view from Cambrigde)
so after a brief early morning session of conference, we escape. this first escapade takes place under the standard of what this place is famous for – education. perhaps appropriately we start from the motherchurch of the Church of Christ, Scientist, established by Mary Baker Eddy sometime in the second half of the 1800s, where the Christian Science Monitor is house, just besides our hotel. the way the impressive space is set up, it really seems that people walk on water…
we walk Massachusetts Avenue over the river, to Cambridge, and find ourselves in M.I.T. territory. before Massachusetts Avenue brings us all to Harvard, there’s glimpse of a terroritoy of warehouses that seem to lead to a different world than the overwhelmingly elist academic spaces. Harvard gets us a bit recalcitrant, this is where nadia does her Allahu Akbar video shot (and see, we keep on thinking Samuel Huntington… of course he’s able to come up with his wonderwarland fairy tale theories in this environment… where would he be now… if we dropped in his office and said, hey samuel, now listen to us…). David had insisted i should go to the Widener Library, but when we’re standing in front of it rickard tells us a story he just heard about a student who was asked to show his student card at the library entrance, and before he knew it he was shot down. (later we realize it was the story of the student who got tasered in the UCLA library that got modified along the way… watch the video here if you want to see images of the Patriot Act in action. disturbing in many ways, including the tone of the officer’s voice when he says “stop fighting us”) doesn’t encourage us to go in. (ay, thinking bad of Harvard, after we already got a bit worked up about the “M.I.T Police” and “Harvard Police” cars, when the violation took place at a University of California campus…).
we end up warming ourselves up in a Starbucks near Harvard Square.
hm, so what do we think about this place…
arriving in the city
arriving late in New York city. the drive through the city at night from La Guardia to Washington Heights is a gentle announcement of more familiarity to come. sahar picks me up at the Presbytarian Hospital. in her new home i find nadia all sleepy on the couch.
buzzing with the story of nadia’s entry into the country, earlier today…
– “What kind of name is this?”
– “Arab,” she says, with pride. (must have been the first red flag in the guy’s mind)
– “What is the purpose of your visit?”
– “I’m going to present a paper at a conference.”
– “What kind of conference?”
– “About the Middle East.” (oops, second red flag…)
– “What will you talk about?”
– “My research on religious experiences of second generation Moroccans in Belgium.”
– “Are Moroccans Muslim?”
– “Yes.” (hm, third red flag…)
– “So tell me, what do you think of jihad.” (yep, the question that inevitably, let’s say logically, follows the red flags…)
– “Well, I understand jihad as an inner struggle…”
– “Yes, I know (!!), but most people understand it as killing people.”
– “It’s a complex notion, we would need some time to sit down and discuss more…”
– “We’ll have this discussion right here and now, because I have to decide to let you in the country or not.”
– “Oh. Well, if by jihad you mean the killing of innocent people, I am against it.”
– “Good. Enjoy your stay in the US.”
it’s funny how quickly one gets used to quotidian environments, and how a visiting friend makes one’s eyes widen once more. the high securitarian character of the country that strikes and repulses nadia. and then, of course, the refrain of her first-day-of-NYC stories: “juist zoals in the film!” (just like in the movies).
halloween
the noise of a helicopter policing the skies, sounds as if it keeps on making circles above our house, as if it were that damned mosquito one doesn’t manage to shake off. sirenes of police cars. halloween 2006 in Santa Cruz. because last year hell broke loose and downtown Santa Cruz was the scene of riots unseen in this small town, this year the police made sure that everybody knew last year’s gig was not to be repeated. warning adds in the local newspapers, massive law enforcement troops all around, extra lights on Pacific Avenue and a helicopter.
tonight was my cooking night, so i do a pumpkin and butter squash (from our garden still!) risotto to stay in the orange tune. we didn’t really plan on disguising, but as the trick-or-treaters come and the excitement in our kitchen grows, i all of a sudden see a black cat where marÃa stood just a second ago. after dinner, we go all together to stroll down Pacific Avenue. thousands and thousands of people. (and massive police forces.) walking up and down Pacific Avenue to show themselves, to look at others.
i had thought that i wouldn’t like it at all. downtown on an average friday or saturday night, when the streets are full of loud drunk (and puking) kids usually gets me depressed. but this is different. this is not usual santa cruz – people come from all over the valley and the hills. never seen santa cruz so brown, so latino. the air, the glances are filled with tension. the night is still young and we don’t stay long, yet we witness one arrest. i imagine how another set of riots this year might crack open the nicely cultivated weirdness of santa cruz. forget weirdness, this is real, albeit “pre-political” as the arrogant and annoying comrades would say… earlier tonight on the corner of our street, marÃa saw a group of latino kids disguised as a gang, looking for action. ah, i feel that i long for it… let this break open, at least for tonight, at least on halloween, when ghostly presences come to haunt… that politics comes to town in the guise of a ghost, seems more than appropriate. but police is everywhere, it’s scary (oh, this could have been made in a game, if the whisper would have spread: let everybody dress up like a police officer…). i want to sleep now, but i can’t escape the sound of this helicopter that keeps on circling around our house…
protest migra raids
a bus adventure to get to Watsonville. the autumn sun beats down on the watsonville plaza, where a bunch of people stand to demand justice for migrants. not very many, perhaps 150 or 200. as we walk towards the crowd, we talk about friends in santa cruz who didn’t see the sense in coming out here. what difference is it going to make? there will probably only be white and documented activists. but no, white people are rather absent (and frankly that doesn’t come as a surprise…). and yes, probably most or all people are documented here, which seems a logical division of labour, as long as these public meetings are not safe for undocumented people, in an economy of solidarity, no?
one moment i’m a bit taken aback by the situation. it’s almost the first public protest (there was a more spontaneous immediate one, in santa cruz, but they say that the group of protesters there was “really small”) after the raids and deportations, and there’s a nasty promise of more raids, yet so little people came out today. there’s no way you can stop it. but if everybody thinks like that, and clearly many many people do, it’s no wonder that the networks of collective action are so fragile. but slowly i get into the atmosphere of the gathering: there’s a sense of community and empowerment which is heart-warming. the shift in emotions is accompanied by one in moving bodies: moving away from the side-walk, where most protesters are standing with banners and slogans directed towards the street (how strange this sensation, cars as the main public of your protest), to the grass in the middle of the plaza. we sit down in a circle, and people talk.
the creation of a migra watch (already prepared by the Brown Berets), the mira migra, seeking to strenghten community connections and enable a fast-travelling alert system when the migra comes back to town. an agricultural laborer talks about working conditions. the head of a local school talks about the children whose parents been taken away, the children who’ve been taken out of school because of fear, and how the school now declares la migra unwelcome on their territory (oh, imagine all kinds of institutions doing that, declaring la migra unwelcome and organizing to keep them out…) fear is tangible and when one of the organizers asks if someone who was close to people who got deported wants to say something, there first is silence. then a woman steps up and talks about the children she works with, telling in fact the story of how she came to america, more than 14 years ago, and found herself working in the fields, not knowing english, and slowly slowly got herself into classes and trainings and now works in a kindergarten. a story of success, for which she is applauded. this should be possible for all, it is said. a member of the Watsonville City Council insists on how this country would crumble without migrant labor, how migrants in fact hold economic power. a black man running for the Santa Cruz City Council, holding a banner with “Black and Brown together”, invokes the image of latino workers bent over in the fields picking strawberries, and talks about how that image takes him back to his ancestors in the cottonfields. crucial that we make the connections, and building a struggle together. mireya gomez, who runs for the Watsonville City Council, speaks about the need to stand up, in the city council and at protest like these, and whereever you are, for those who cannot vote, and will not be officially represented. a refrain of ¡Si, Se Puede!, and a people’s clap to wrap it up.
the Brown Berets are a discrete presence, without their uniforms, as agreed at the meeting. so that it can be a protest of “the people”. the other discussion last thursday now seems a bit unnecessary: what role the Brown Berets would take if the people want to go to the streets and march (the permit was for a rally at the plaza only). but it is not going to happen with this (small) crowd.
at some point marÃa and i stray to the taquerÃa, hang out for a while, search for a bus home. at the bus stop marÃa sees that bone-chilling advertisement for an agency that pays bail bonds, for sure they do good business in “gang” town Watsonville… Buy your freedom. still at the bus stop, a latino man who works here. when marÃa asks him, at some point in the conversation, whether he has friends here, he shakes his head. no.
as much as Santa Cruz makes me angry, Watsonville provokes a certain tenderness. both towns are equally small (~ 50.000 inhabitants) and have a basic agricultural layer, only Santa Cruz is on top of that a beach resort, a campus town, a silicon valley dorm-suburb, a hippie hang-out place, and supposedly the west-coast dyke capital. the things that give Santa Cruz a bit of an urban character, as people say. (but i keep on insisting that they got the notion of urban wrong.) and the things that make Santa Cruz so white and liberal – paradise as many here say. (but i’m sure by now you got my take on that.) oh, i have sudden strong fantasies of moving to watsonville. marÃa gives me a big sceptical smile, and of course i know she’s right (it would take us 4 hours a day to commute to campus by public transport, and since when do i like small rural places anyway… but i actually like this one, it is different from the white xenophobic place, where one gets beaten up if you are not “from” there, that shaped my visceral dislike of small rural places…). but it sure feels a good idea to spend more time here.
Heathrow – USA
flying from London Heathrow to the U.S. with an american airline is rather cheap at the moment. “Everyday Low Fares” as UKwebsite of United Airlines announces. and the full security experience comes for free.
in fact we already met with security on the London underground. from Manor House to Heathrow is a straight line, the Picadilly line, but it takes a good while (as a number of us remember very well from when rutvica and camille were waiting at Heathrow for giulia and me, who basically left Manor House too late, to catch a flight to Athens for the ESF…). taking the promised extra security into account, we left Manor House really early. only to get stuck underground between Manor House and Finsbury park. for the longest time. morning peak hours, too many people, not enough oxygen. amazing how people responded through basically ignoring that we were standing still in a small and dark tunnel with no idea what was happening. people focused on their trashy newspapers or novels. when there finally is an announcement, we are told that there’s a fire alert on the Victoria line and that the train cannot continue. for a moment giulia and i exchange glances, there’s something strange about the Victoria line story cause basically we’re on the Picadilly line. when the train finally moves, it only takes us to Finsbury Park where it stops all together, we are advised to change to the Victoria line. stranger still. but everybody stays very calm and english-style polite. and the mass of people gathered in the station by now slowly starts filling trains on the Victoria line. once we’re on that train, we get the information that there’s a serious fire alert on the Picadilly line. this is confirmed in the other stations we have to change and pass through, so it seems that the story while we were on the Picadilly line was manufactured to keep people from panicking. it worked. it also makes you think what Picadilly fire story is supposed to do.
we get to Heathrow later than we had planned, but the long queues we had come to imagine didn’t materialize. still, the wait is longer than the queue would suggest, as every passanger has to answer an elaborate list of questions. at the end of that list i ask if it is okay to take the small container for my lenses with some drops of liquid on board with me.
– “oh no,” says the United Airlines woman decisively, “no liquids”.
– “i understand, but at some point during the journey i will need to take my lenses out.”
– “i understand, but liquids cannot go on board.”
– “so there will there be liquid for lenses provided on the plane, for passengers who need some?”
– “ah, i don’t think so,” she apologizes.
– “but this is a journey from London to San Francisco with overlay. my eyes can’t take it that long. this qualifies as special needs.”
– “i hear what you’re saying. and if these security measures become permanent, we’ll have to come up with solutions. but it’s all very new at the moment, we’re all still trying to figure it out. you know, after what happened…”
i bite my tongue not to say, after what didn’t happen…
– “and you don’t have glasses with you?”
– “no…” (a little lie for the sake of poking in their absurd security measures…)
she apologizes and suggests that i can take the container with me and ask the security people, but warns us that i mostly likely will have to leave the lenses container with them. i thank her and take up the suggestion. giulia shakes her head at this reflex to stand on my grounds and not move and keep on arguing when dealing with red tape, bureaucrazy and other official shit.
security is indeed more tight. a display of all the items you cannot take on board, it resembles the cosmetic corner in a department store. more things need to go through the x-ray, more people get body-searched. i decide not to ask anything beforehand, saving up the arguing for after the x-ray. only, that never happens cause my “liquids” pass x-ray without a problem. interesting.
but security doesn’t end here, there’s more at the gate of my flight, organized by United Airlines this time. after another passport check, all the passengers of our flight have their handluggage thoroughly checked and are being body-searched. the queue is long and once i’ve passed passport control i decide not to join the end the snake of people, waiting instead till the snakes gets shorter and one can cut through the curves. while i’m standing there, and effectively creating a second queue, a flight attendent comes to me and signals me to go through. without the extra body and luggage check. they were running out of time. thus goes the true story of how i smuggled liquids on the plane after the august 2006 non-event…
Chicago. my point of entry in the country, so this is where i need to do custums and immigration control. for some reason i have an intuition that it will be more tight, less friendly, than in San Francisco. which doens’t bother me too much, cause i react badly to the friendliness combined with this hyper-security (as you might remember). it surely is less friendly, but also less tight. well relatively speaking, after all we’re living in times of security: two digital fingerprints and a digital picture, and a new paper stappled in my passport, with the warning that i’m into trouble if i lose that piece of paper. (which i know by now.) but no extra x-ray of luggage like in san francisco.
the guy who does the prints and picture looks like a military brute. his collegue asks him something about a commercial, and he answers that he wouldn’t know, cause he doesn’t watch television. “it makes your brain rot,” he adds, and looks at me for confirmation. “oh yes,” i respond with the big smile, also to the other passport control officer, “it makes your brain rot.” “i prefer to read,” says the guy, “i read 5 newspapers a day.” if i wouldn’t get damned so nervous and uncomfortable in these security situations, i would have wanted to ask him which newspapers, i’m still curious.
boxes
‘t Is gebeurd, c’est fini, the saga of the boxes is over. This story pursued me for the last couple of months, and most often i’ve avoided to go into much detail. True, it was very easy to put it in a nutshell: “it’s such a mess”. Today we’ve put an end to the mess – which would have never been possible without marÃa’s doing. Let me now finally tell you the story. It starts with the fact that settling here wasn’t the easiest thing in the world. Besides the stories which you already know, there was a very material thing of my work refusing to travel with me. First i found that my work in digital form didn’t make the crossing: the whole folder on my laptop meredith named “work” just happened to be empty when i arrived here. Empty. Papers, interviews, presentations, articles… since 1998 – gone. It took some weeks, and Wendy’s work and effort, to retrieve almost all documents from some far away hidden cave on the Constant server. Then there were the books and documents which i shipped with a Dutch/Belgian shipping company Cleve en zonen sometime beginning of January. The two boxes were supposed to arrive in San Francisco (Oakland) mid-February. Around that time i get a bill from the Californian partners of the shipping company, Primary Freight in L.A., that seems outrageous to me. So i call to ask for clarification. The woman i talk to actually advises me not to pay just yet, as the boxes are in a container held by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It seems unlikely at that stage that the container will be able to enter the country, due to post 9/11 security measures. It’s not my books that are causing the problem, the woman adds. A week later her intuition is confirmed – the container cannot enter – and she tells me that the boxes will remain on the who will soon be on its way home, to Rotterdam. I was almost ready to leave for New York at the time, couldn’t imagine myself settling in Santa Cruz, and the idea that my books would be returning home was a great relief.
Having just left New York and arrived in London i got an email saying that my shipment had passed Customs and Border Protection in Los Angelos. What the hell… Some days later in Italy i made a firm phonecall to Cleve en zonen in Antwerpen making it clear that the shipment was hopelessly late for me, would need to be shipped back home as soon as possible and that i refused to pay for the extra costs. What i got from the other side of the line: a confirmation that this was beyond the reasonable delay time for shipments, “the container from hell” was the nick-name the guy used. Plus a commitment that “the client” should not carry the extra costs for this and so their insurance would. A bit more foggy with respect to the effort of sending the boxes home – “So, hm, are you sure the shipment has become useless to you?” “Yes, my mission over there is finished,” i remember saying, “i will need the books very soon back in Brussels.” “Hm, i see, let’s see what we can do…” I got in contact with Primary Freight immediately, and let them know that the shipment should go back to Rotterdam as soon possible on the costs of the insurance company of Cleve en zonen. A second email from them to confirm, and i confirm. A second moment of relief that it is over.
When i return to California in the beginning of May marÃa gives me letter from U.S. Customs and Borders which arrived at the old address in Kenneth Street. An outrageous bill for storage costs for the two boxes… After many angry phonecalls to L.A. and Antwerpen, in which i manage to convince the woman in L.A. to forward me her email conversation with the people in Antwerpen, it seems that Primary Freight had also asked Cleve en zonen for a confirmation for the return of the shipment and Cleve en zonen never responded to that question. So the two boxes travelled from L.A. to Oakland, stayed in the free storage for a number of days and then moved on different storage places which charged a lot… Initially i refuse to deal with it – it’s these shipping companies that fucked up so they better solve the problem. Phonecalls are incredibly frustrating as they feel like talking to, and banging my head against, a wall. Although in some way i end up getting beyond the wall with the Primary Freight woman, when i get really angry and bring the conversation on a personal level with her. It usually goes like this: after 15 minutes of impossibilities and other crap, i get upset and tell her that this is intolerable. “Karen,” i tell her, “i’m not some kind of company or agent, don’t give me the standard shit. It’s not as if i can put these costs on my insurance, i’m paying this from my own money that i work for [here i am performing the employee, although i admit that the Marie Curie scholarship doesn’t really feel like that…]. You also work for your money, how would you feel when you pay for something that first of all is not delivered, and secondly generates even more outrageous costs because the company neglected to communicate well?” At this point she tends to get helpful, and every phonecall we do the same routine all over again… Then there are super frustrating phonecalls to Cleve en zonen in Antwerpen, to U.S. Customs and Borders Protection in Oakland and to Penn Logistics in Oakland. As all the parties involved put so much energy in emphasizing where and how they are not responsible, i’m starting to understand the fragmentation of the process – everyone is involved in a distinct part of the travel of my boxes, and already has a finger pointed to someone else when it seems that something went wrong somewhere along the way. I also understand that they are not very used to deal with individuals, even the U.S. Customs and Border Protection suggests in first instance to hire a broker to do all the paper work. Then there is a guardian angel, her name also Karen, at the Bayport Warehouse in San Leandro, where the boxes are actually located. She guides me through the whole thing, making it possible to envision what driving up to Oakland to pick up the boxes would look like in pratical terms. And while the others keep on saying that is unlikely that all can be done in one day, she insists that it is possible. She also suggests a way to navigate the red tape: “Make sure that people take pity on you,” the thing she no doubt did. She even suggests the possibility of simply not picking up the boxes (after a certain amount of time in storage they are destroyed) and not paying (only a part of) the costs. Which had also crossed my mind, and i could use Marie Curie money to buy the books again, but the boxes also contain some personal documents – it’s my Istanbul diary that ruled out that option.
It’s marÃa who takes out a day to go with me, and we have david’s Volvo to do the trick. Our first stop is of course at the Bayport Warehouse in San Leandro, with the guardian angel who turns out to be a middle-age obese woman. A warehouse in an industrial park, an empty office (not one poster on the wall) with hardly any colleagues. It strikes us miserable working conditions. From there we drive to the U.S. Customs and Border protection in Oakland. Here we enter the port, and soon we are the only car in the midst of American monster trucks (thank God for the Volvo…). At some point, stuck in between two of those which totally blocks our view on the road, we find ourselves driving on a scale to weigh the trucks, before we realize we need to be in the other lane. I get out the car to run up to the small cabin besides the scale to ask the person who works there for directions. A young woman on her own, once more we’re struck by her working environment.
U.S. Customs and Borders – this is the terrain of the Department of Homeland Security, as a big flag reminds us in cause we would have forgotten the economy of security in this country. The two men in line before us, apparently picking up a shipment from Thailand, get all kinds of questions. How often do you go to Thailand? What do you do there? Employees come in and out, and they tend to be very generous, with greetings and smiles. They also tend to be people of color. And they’re all armed. When it’s my turn it goes so much smoother than some of the phonecalls had lead me to fear. “So, what took you so long to pick up those boxes?” I begin the long-winded story, the one that you are now reading, and quickly the woman says “alright, alright.” I get the necessary stamps and clearance.
Penn Logistics where the boxes had stored at first for a ridiculous amont of money. The office part of the warehouse is very small, a bit claustrofobic. Three woman, two of them obese. Then i discover an aquarium with two boa snakes. One of the woman has a pluche snake near her desk. It somehow seems that the three have created their own little world in here, which strikes us as quite surreal. Working conditions, again. While i do the paper work marÃa sits down on the only chair for visitors and picks up the only book on the coffee table. A 9/11 photobook. At some point i hear her close the book and put it on the table again with a slam, accompanied with a sign. We look at each other, time to get out of this place. I finish my business with the woman who happened to be someone i spoke on the phone with – i recognize her voice. One of those voices who insisted that “we are not responsible.” At some point she acknowledges our phonecall, and apologetically explains that they can’t take risks and then you never now and usually she never even gets to see the people (ah, another complication: i don’t have bank account here so i had to pay all the bills in cash, usually she gets checks mailed to her). I just try to think about how the world looks like from a miserable office with two boa snakes and a 9/11 photobook and the complicity between three woman who don’t exactely look joyful. The outside world must often seem limited to voices on the phone – asking, disputing, complicating things; phones you’d prefer to put down as soon as you can.
Back to Bayport Warehouse. Meanwhil Karen is dealing with an unforseen problem, Primary Freight can’t confirm receipt yet of a money order i send them some days ago. We pay the money again to Karen, who writes us a check for precisely the same amount, which we can cash as soon as she gets notice Primary Freight. Her boss drops by again – it seems as our visit to the offices brings some action in the day – and she’s clearly not supposed to do be doing this. It is a matter of trust (we could retracted the money order and cash this check immediately, or she could make it impossible for us to cash the check so the payment is done twice), and the trust is clearly mutual. So what makes the world look differently from this miserable office? Back home we send Karen a post-card from Santa Cruz with a beautiful sunset. Perhaps the walls of her office will not be entirely empty anymore.
spiritual activism (day two) at the white house
The appointments with “our” political representatives this morning. I chose to skip them – part of me is very tempted to do participant observartion: join other people going to talk to their Californian congressmen and women, and even intervene in the conversations if i feel like it, who knows. But another part of me finds it too much, and then the jet-lag that i forgot to schedule does try to kick in. I sleep a bit longer and spend a morning walking through “political Washington”.
I get there by bus, from Columbia Heights where Jayne’s appartment is. As we’re approaching the city, it’s strikes me that i’m the only white body on this bus, and that many of the black and latino bodies are marked by a lack of various kinds of resources. In the middle of wide avenues and imposing government buildings, and suits, ties and briefcases walking briskly and purposefully, this slow bus seems somehow out of place. The people whose posture reflects a sense of entitlement to these streets and the whole world it invokes, are not on this bus. I get myself to Capitola Hill, and do the long walk to the White House. War in my head: images of war and poverty keep flashing before my eyes. It’s infuriating. The more i look around, the more men and women in suits and ties seem to transform into small and not so small agents of this giant war machine. Am i in the headquaters now? Can’t help thinking: this place should be bombed, should be flattened with the ground.
Commotion: police cars with sirenes racing in, out of nowhere, from every direction. They surround a truck with latino road workers. It seems that the truck was taking taking a road that it shouldn’t take, in order to get to the road works. The mistake is cleared out in a couple of minutes, the truck turns around, the police cars disappear as fast as they had come. Five minutes later there’s no trace of the commotion. A sense of heavy yet rather invisible surveillance remains. This place should be bombed, but when the workers’ shift is over. (is there ever such a moment, in between janitors and the construction workers?).
LaFayette Park, opposite the White House. the pray-inn, called for by the Network for Spiritual Progressives has just started. Cindy Sheehan is speaking. Then there’s Code Pink, who were gathered in Washington after their recent Mother’s Day vigil. I recognize a old grey-haired woman whom i saw in the Greyhound Station in Oakland in the beginning of this month. As she squatted on the floor besides her backpack with a tag with a Washington, carrying a peace sign and wearing quite some pink, i remembered thinking that i could guess where she was heading. Many people speak and propose prayers, some sing. Sahar, guess who was also in the crowd, the iranian guy who spoke at the NYC demo against the war in Iraq. “Long live Venezuela. Friendship with Iran”, is the message that he carries around.
At the end of the pray-inn we march to the white house. In the midst of all the imposing buildings in this neighborhood, this white house is deceptively small. Almost a bit insignificant, as if it wants to convey the message: don’t pay too much attention to me, i’m just another rich guy’s house. It also seems deceptively accessible. But as we get closer, the “police do not cross” yellow tape all around the gates becomes visible. We march with many papers, which are spread out all over the marchers. These are the names of people who signed the petition to stop the war on the Iran before it starts. as we approach the gates, people lift their arms and hold the papers in the air. Don’t Iraq Iran, is one of the slogans.
Disappointment: we are not allowed to officially hand the petition to White House. In the end people throw the papers over the gates. Some people get angry. Others get put off by the anger. They get into discussions with each other (why do you need to get angry? etc.). I get put off by the discussions, which don’t seem to lead anywhere, and which add nothing to the discussions on different tactics within a demonstration that are familiar to me. I actually get a bit upset with those who don’t like the anger – i mean, this is one of the most peaceful marches i’ve ever been to (and i’m sure there’s a reason for that, i’m sure the police would intervene massively and quickly if someone stepped over some kind of line), and the slight bit of anger against the refusal of an official reception of the petitions does not seem out of place at all. I have respect for the radical non-violence stance of some of the marchers, for whom shouting was inacceptable, only i felt that their annoying questions (do you really need to shout?) were not only counterproductive but also reflected a lack of creativity. If they wanted a different kind of energy, this was not the way; they could have tried to sing a song or something. (Coming to think of it, one of the songs was All we are saying, is give peace a chance… equally a bit tiresome…)
I turn away from the crowd and focus a bit on the police. They must be slightly amused by the discussions among the marchers, although their masked expressions don’t show it. They are filming all of us. I’m starting to feel in the mood for a little conversation. I turn to the cop near me, whom i see very well is not the leader of the gang, and ask him very sweetly:
– Excuse me Sir, can i just ask you for some information?
He gives me a friendly nod.
– The thing is, i’m a relatively new resident of this country (okay, a little lie, but it sounds better than “i’m an alien non-resident”) and i don’t really understand the situation. Could you explain me what exactely is the problem with giving the citizen’s petition to someone who can bring it to the White House?
Very friendly he explains me that it would be better if i’d spoke to his superior, to which he leads me. I repeat the thing, adding this time:
– Cause you see, i would have thought that this would have been a civic right, in line with the first ammendment?
The superior (y’r typical ugly cop):
– Well, it’s their right to accept it or not, and they won’t accept. You see, that’s your right; if somebody comes to your house, you can choose if you receive them or not.
I’m baffled by the comparison of the White House to any private house. I think back of cop-conversations when our actions were stopped around the parliament and government buildings in Brussels. Their the argument would be that we were disturbing a “neutral” zone with “progaganda”. Here the argument is connected to the sanctity of private space?
– But Sir, surely that is not the same thing. The White House is not a private house, it has a political function.
He considers for a moment, and responds:
– Okay, yes, it’s something political [sic!]. But you know, there’s always a security issue.
Ah, the saving grace of security. From the private straight to security, pushing out the public-political.
– A security issue for papers? We just want to hand over some papers?
– Oh yes, papers can be very dangerous.
In the meantime we’re surrounded by a bunch of marchers. Frankly everybody looked rather baffled. The exchange should have been filmed – the kind police officer in front of the White House saying that papers can be dangerous was quite a powerful image. (The conversation was in fact filmed, but by the police). As we continued talking among us, i understood that i didn’t quite get the thing as it was intended. In my imaginary, it was all about non-democratic regimes declaring the written word to be dangerous. My co-marchers assured me that the cop was invoking the threat of anthrax.
The march continues to Rumsfeld’s house, but the participants to the Spiritual Activism conference are asked to convene at the All Souls Church for the rest of the afternoon and evening program. As we move in small groups, i pick up more and more conversations of people who didn’t like the energy at the march, how some people were aggressive, etc. I shut up, don’t feel like arguing, pretend i don’t know these people. Then a woman addresses me and when she finds out that i’m from Europe, she asks why the EU did nothing to stop the war in Iraq. I suddenly feel like arguing – Oh, who exactely took the initiative for this war? And where exactely were all the millions and millions of people in the street in this country, as happened in many cities all over the world? (i mean, extrapolating the number of people that got together in Rome on the 15th of Feb in 2003, that would translate in about 15 million people on the streets of NYC or Washington.) And more than that, do you think those massive marches would have happened if people couldn’t overcome the “i don’t like the atmosphere of this march” feeling and got stuck arguing about “why are you shouting?”. Plus the way in which the “punishment” of warmongers like Blair and Aznar provokes a certain kind of understanding among many people throughout europe, although they don’t agree with the tactics of the violent attacks, which destablizes or interrupts a hegemonic use of “the events” like that of 9/11 in the US, for more war. I’m all about criticizing and organizing against european goverments and policies, but what about getting a bit more active within the belly of the beast instead of hoping for someone or something “from outside” to stop the US? (oh friends, i already told you, this spiritual activism conference really doesn’t bring out the best in me…) The woman politely turns away and continued chatting with the other people, pretending not to know me.
if there’s a black list, i wanna be on it
Yesterday evening we got a phonecall in the house, from some charity organisation to sollicit (financial) support for “our troops”. Strange to get such a call at home, especially when the only answer i could come up with on the phone is: the only thing about “our troops” we support at this stage, is immediate withdrawal, like NOW. Was it really a charity that called us? Does this mean our house now features in the TALON database?
Technologies and mentality of surveillance and control are spreading at such a speed that sometimes one can only make fun of them. Time to play. This morning: a funny follow-up mail on the War on Terror teach-in at Santa Cruz two weeks ago. The message let us know that, while the Pentagon eventually got the UCSC protest against military recruitement on the campus out of TALON, a conservative blog writer published all the kids’ names and emails and guess what – they all received death-threats. Okay, not a very funny game, but it does get better. The message included a letter from UC Davis to the Pentagon, concerning their upcoming teach-in against the war. (and note that i’m not the only one connecting the surfing “fun-loving” culture of this place with a profound lack of political passion and activity…)
———————————————————————————-
Lt. Col. Gary Testut
Threat and Local Observation Notice Database (TALON)
Pentagon
Washington, DC
Dear Lt. Col. Testut,
We, faculty and students of the University of California at Davis, would like to Call your attention to an upcoming teach-in at our campus titled “Connecting the Dots: The War on Terror and You.†In particular, we urge you to consider designating our teach-in a “credible threat†in your TALON database.
As you may be aware, the different campuses of the University of California compete vigorously with each other to attract students, faculty, and research funds. Your designation of protests at UC Santa Cruz as a “credible threat†bestows considerable prestige on that campus. In the interest of fairness, we believe you owe it to us to seriously consider our teach-in for the same honor.
Though you have never made public what criteria you use to judge what constitutes a “credible threat,†we are certain that, by any criteria you may be secretly using, our activities here at Davis constitute a threat at least as credible as any in Santa Cruz.
• Demonstrations: our students have held numerous, vibrant, and well-attended demonstrations, including demonstrations against military recruiters on campus.
• Radical student groups: our campus takes just as much pride in promoting freedom of speech and scholarship that Santa Cruz does, and you will find student political groups here from across the entire political spectrum.
• Diversity: our faculty and student body include many people of color and foreign nationals, including people from the Middle East.
Furthermore, there are factors which we believe make our activities at Davis a more credible threat than anything in Santa Cruz:
Our campus not only has the same mix of freedom of speech, anti-war groups, and immigrants and minorities, but we also host significant military research. This combination of immigrants, freedom of speech, and military research should be enough to conjure up a credible threat in the mind of even the most complacent TALON investigator.
Finally, please note that Santa Cruz is the site of one of the world’s best surf breaks. No matter how passionate their students may be about political causes, if the surf is up they will run for their boards, giving your recruiters ample opportunity to present their message to the non-surfing student body. Here at Davis, having no such diversions, our students are more serious and focused. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to hearing from you at the earliest opportunity.
not an angry girl
The plane takes off in London Heathrow and i recognise a familiar anger slowly raising its ugly head. By the time we land in San Francisco i’m both steaming and amazed at how this place (the U.S. in general? California? or tiny Santa Cruz and all it stands for?) is able to trigger off this anger in me. All these weeks, almost two months of travelling, through multi-layered and nuanced physical and affective landscapes, through a spectre of different shades of connection and different types of relationships one can have to a particular space. And then BANG, sheer anger.
This time – it strikes me as well – there is no alienation of “stepping into the other side of the television screen”, that might have mediated the anger. No, this international airport already feels familiar. And so i get upset when customs officials do their surveillance job with much friendliness and a smile. “You have a beautiful handwriting,” says the guy who checks my forms and papers. “You have very beautiful eyes. Grey and green and blue, it probably depends on the light?” says the guy who takes digital fingerprints and a picture of me. The friendly faces of this surveillance make me want to scream… But all i say is: “Would that be information you need to let me in the country?” He looks a bit embarrased, turns very concentrated to the screen in front of him. I feel like asking why all of this is necessary, they already have my fingerprints and multiple pictures, digital and non-digital, of me. But i bite my tongue. The game of friendliness is strictly regulated, as big notices remind the aliens & non-residents at all times: Insulting or threatening a customs officer is an offense.
Camille’s words in Athens ring through my head, and it seems a good idea to take them (more) seriously. That such anger of the “alien” is important to articulate, that it points to things that people who are more settled in a place don’t see or feel anymore. And she talked about all the things that made her angry and upset in her first months in the UK. The blatent signs and marks of a deeply classist society that repulsed her, and the fact that it didn’t seem to upset other people so much – something which is perhaps even more repulsive. And i think of all the friends who are very angry about things in Belgium and Flanders and Europe, and how that anger is precious to me. An anger that i can and do share but often it comes from a different source, i.e. when it requires the labour of learning to see the mechanisms and privileges that i have been brought up with, and have learned to take for granted. So i’m determined to articulate better the ways in which this Santa Cruz feels so wrong.
But for the moment of arrival it’s good to be saved from my anger, and that is precisely what Natascha and Kelly do.